jump to navigation

Have No Fear! It’s Foreskin Man! June 7, 2011

Posted by The Prodigal Son in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
trackback

I was looking something up the other day and I found a story about a comic book called ‘Foreskin Man’… Here’s a link to the original (so you can go ahead and view both issues in full before you pass judgement):

Foreskin Man

Anyhow… I came to find out that San Francisco has been actively trying to ban the act of infant genital mutilation, which I found hard to believe… and that some within that movement (who call themselves ‘Intactivists’) had created and published a couple of comic books to help advance their agenda…

One of these comic books deals specifically with the ‘Jewish’ religious aspect of all of this (obviously because they circumcise their male children) so I posted a link about the story to the Orthodox Christianity.net forum:

‘Foreskin Man’ Comic Book Attacks Circumcision

I also posted the following images…

Well, you would’ve thought it was the end of the world!

I was called racist, antisemite, hateful, etc, etc, blah blah blah… Then they deleted the whole works, images, thread and all.

Then I was ‘Muted’ from posting for an indeterminate amount of time and all of my subsequent messages to the moderators and administrators of the site have been ignored.

I think maybe I’ve been shunned! Gasp!

To follow is a little sample of the kind of messages I received from other members there for posting no more than what you see above on the board which is supposedly set aside as a ‘Free-For-All’ forum for discussion of “Religious Topics”:

So much for “Hot/Controversial/Debate!

“Apparently over at OC.net – circumcision is not considered a religious topic and is not up for debate.

And for God’s sake – don’t dare mention that the filthy ‘rabbis’ suck the blood from the  baby’s bleeding penis (with their mouths!) when they’re done slicing and tearing the end off of it with their claw-like thumbnails! (See fourth and fifth images: ‘Monster Mohel’ above) That kind of truth is absolutely not welcome!!

Actually, it seems it’s not a topic at all since it has been wiped from existence over there (the first time I’ve ever seen such a thing take place) and I’ve been silenced. Apparently I’m not ‘Banned’ but I might as well be because I can’t say or do anything now.

Message:

The comic you gave a link to is full of crude and unpleasant stereotypes including monstrous looking individuals with hook noses threatning women. All pretty standard stuff from the antisemitic playbook of whip up fear by showing how the Judenrat are threatning our women blah blah blah.

A fairly nasty piece of work and the moderator is to be commended for removing the images you posted from the site.

Another:

The whole series of images you posted, which were thank God removed, contains stereotypes of the most asinine and offensive kind.

And:

You are muted. I do not know if that equates to a permanent ban or not on this site. It must be said the moderators have been remarkably patient with you on the whole. I have acted as a moderator on forums like this and political ones in the past. If you really cannot see why your posts are at times viewed as so offensive it is past my meager ability to explain why.

So, I invite anyone to view these comics in their entirety and tell me specifically where they see ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’ in this anti-circumcision activism. Please…

I asked everyone who mentioned it to show me where this alleged ‘antisemitism’ is… but – nothing.

“Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation! For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh,”
– Philippians 3

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

†IC XC†

†NI KA†

Comments»

1. Mike - June 9, 2011

Its a shame that our Orthodox faith is also being watered down & corrupted by fools, libtards, & modernists! Shame on them over at (Pseudo) OC.net!

2. The Prodigal Son - June 10, 2011

Yes… Pray for them that God may allow them to see past the trees and notice the woods… that are on fire.

As an update… I have been officially banned from OC.net now. (Sob!)

I think maybe the admins over there don’t like being told that they are cowards. I sent them multiple messages asking how long I had been ‘muted’ for and not one of them ever had the courtesy (or the guts) to ever send me any answers.

They are mostly (if not all) former Protestants that have fast-tracked their way into the priesthood and they are ruining Orthodoxy. They think ‘Israel’ is a bunch of anti-Christ Pharisees and their descendants living in illegally occupied Palestine!

I’ve even seen St. John Chrysostom called ‘antisemitic’ over there!

Personally, I think one has to be more than a little simple to see ‘antisemitism’ in any of the above images – let alone in any and every mention of ‘Jews’. They are like Pavlov’s dogs; drooling accusations of ‘antisemitism’ all over the place on cue. It’s pathetic.

So be it. I’m forced to shake the dust from my feet.

3. Marcus - June 10, 2011

A Chara,

You’ve provided the zenith of proof as to the content of this abysmal entry in the history of comics when you display the pages (yet again) that you showed on the Orthodox forum on your blog here. No other arguments are neccesary than simply to let people look at them for themselves and marvel, although I think perhaps that use of the word marvel is an insult to a certain well known comics publisher.

About this quote from you:

They are mostly (if not all) former Protestants that have fast-tracked their way into the priesthood and they are ruining Orthodoxy. They think ‘Israel’ is a bunch of anti-Christ Pharisees and their descendants living in occupied Palestine!

Rather a large claim to make is it not? I imagine your response may be something along the lines of ‘but so are yours about Foreskin Man.’ Indeed they are but I can support mine showing how this work is in a tradition of such junk stretching back to crude woodcuts from the middle ages against other ‘venerable’ traditions. Can you please tell us how you support the assertion that most of the moderators and amdinistrators of OC. net are ‘former Protestants that have fast-tracked their way into the priesthood’?

Mise Le Meas

Marcus

The Prodigal Son - June 10, 2011

Hi Marcus,

Well, thanks for the reply… but though you confidently declare that I’ve provided “the zenith of proof” you have not given me an example either. I thought you said no other arguments were neccessary!

In that case it should be no problem for you (or anyone) to finally point out for me specifically where in the above images you see something “abysmal”. Someone else said something about “grotesquely large hook noses”… but when I asked them to show me: which image? Which one specifically?

Nothing. Silence. Ignore me.

As I suspect you will also do.

Rather a large claim to make is it not?

(…) Can you please tell us how you support the assertion that most of the moderators and amdinistrators of OC. net are ‘former Protestants that have fast-tracked their way into the priesthood’?

A “large claim”?

I guess… if you say so.

I spent more than a year over there.

I actually started a thread once called ‘Who Are You People?’ or something like that in which I started a poll asking as much straight out.

The others I have seen discuss that fact on the forum. I think most of them are from former Baptist/Evangelical backgrounds. I am not saying that everyone there is a former Protestant but a lot of them are. The Orthodox Church has not really ‘dogmatized’ many of the finer details – so it leaves room for them to bring a lot of their Judaized Protestant nonsense in with them.

The worst being an overt tendency toward Judeophilia and support for the thieving and murderous anti-Christ ‘Jewish state’ in Palestine.

†IC XC†
†NI KA†

4. 正教会の智 - June 10, 2011
5. 正教会の智 - June 10, 2011

Marcus:

I think perhaps that use of the word marvel is an insult to a certain well known comics publisher”

Oh no!

An insult to the multi-billion dollar Jew racket that has been pumping Jewbism into kids (and now also millions of adults’) minds for 50 years!

6. Mike - June 10, 2011

Marcus,

I suggest you read (or re-read, or truly read & COMPREHEND) the wisdom of the early Church Fathers & the Scriptures. It truly does seem to me that there are a lot of neophyte Orthodox converts in the USA today, of which I, too, am one..

However, unlike many of them I see speaking like they are suddenly the authority of Orthodoxy, I checked my ‘Protestantism’ in at the door when I became a catechumen. The Orthodox position on Zionism & Judaism, as with heresy & any other anti-Christ doctrine, was– & should always be– ANATHEMA.

Israel is the Church. The modern-day Christ-denying, Christ-hating Jews are not God’s Chosen People, but rather the People of God’s Curse. Read your Bible. Read the Canons. Read the Church Fathers. I joined the Orthodox Church for its historical TRUTH in Faith & correct belief in our Lord. Please quit ‘mainstreaming’ & ‘modernizing’ & making ‘politically-correct’ apostasies out of Orthodoxy.

It is making me ill. I see so many of these watered down Orthodox lately–particularly the Antiochians in America– bringing their Judaizing & dual covenant blasphemies into the Church & even the priesthood! STOP! You are ruining Orthodoxy with this Zionist & Globalist heresy!!! Ecumenism & modernism are destroying the Body of Christ!

Lord Have Mercy!!

7. Marcus - June 11, 2011

A Chara,

First of all Mike I am not an American, I am Irish and the nearest Protestant relative I can think of is my great uncle Dennis who has been dead for more than 25 years in any case. I could hardly check my ‘Protestantism’ in at the door under those circumstances. I am not actually Orthodox either, I am a Catholic of the Latin rite, however I am married to a member of the ROC which is why I was attracted to Orthodox net as a forum. Your points strike me as an Orthodox version of some of the rhetoric that the more extreme members of the SSPX have engaged in at times. I can understand the arguments that advance the view that the Jews are no longer God’s chosen people on the basis that if they were it would create an unavoidable contradiction between the Church being Israel. That argument does not necessarily need to be linked to some of the views above which smack of rank bigotry frankly.

By the way our host here asked me to point out specifically what I saw wrong in the images from this work. Certainly, let us start with the cover & the blond ubermensch figure posed prominently. It may or may not also be a coincidence he is holding an 8 ball given the symbolic usage the number 8 is put to in neo-Nazi and associated circles. That one though I’ll let pass as the 8 ball tends to be a visual cliche when someone picks up a pool ball in comics or cartoons. Next we have the women being forcibly restrained by the ‘other’ in this case a number of Jews drawn with sinister smiles.

Finally we have the topper, the piece de resistance, the innocent child being threatened by the ‘other’. Add little details like the young woman being shown in a slightly cheesecake fashion and we have a classic piece of propaganda. It has the brave resolute hero protecting his land from the dirty foreigners with their outsiders’ way who threaten the women and children of the nation.

The implied sexual subtexts of young attractive women being threatened by the naughty, naughty Jews in that cover and some of the other images is far from subtle either. In any case many of the posts on this issue here thus far are interesting, it’s apparently not anti-semitic but yet talk of ‘crypto-Jews’ and Zionist globalists abounds whilst defending it.

8. Marcus - June 11, 2011

Oh almost forgot again, these are some of your own words on the Orthodox forum in question:-

The moderator (who you think “is to be commended”) is probably Jewish too I’m guessing. I think he’s still cranky from back when someone asked me about the ‘Holocaust’.

What about you? Any Talmudists in the old family tree?”

You were talking to me there. Would you care to comment on those remarks at all? Also Unforgiven is a great Clint Eastwood movie I’m sure you’d agree…

9. Mike - June 11, 2011

Well, then I suggest you check your post-V2 Roman Catholic heresy at the door then, and read the works of such greats as St. John Chrysostom, St. Basil, and St. Augustine. I have more sympathy for the Palestinians over there than I do the Zionist Jews, those of Rev.2:9 & 3:9. Its all quite simple. The ‘modern’ churches are being apostasized & Judaized. They are becoming Laodicean– lukewarm. And it’s a shame. Thank God there is still a Remnant of True Israel to keep Truth & God’s Church alive.

10. Marcus - June 11, 2011

My post V2 heresy. How amusingly predictable and droll. Whilst the Church may have clarified it’s approach on certain matters and removed the prayer urging Jews to convert it does not regard Judaism as the faith in which the truth of Christ is revealed at it’s fullest. Nor do I. However the Church also never had much time for the simplistic bigotry and prejudice idiocy like ‘Foreskin Man’ represents. Sadly many individuals within both the Catholic and Orthodox Church have GIVEN this kind of foolishness credence.

Ah the old ‘synagogue of Satan’ misuse of scriptures clunks up the hill predictably I see. Actually when you get done trying to build your straw man which suggest I am an uncritical defender of Israel and all it’s policies you might see fit to ask me how I actually view the conflict there.

Marcus

11. Mike - June 11, 2011

Hey, it is what it is. I cannot expect most of ‘the world’ to understand. The Great Apostasy is upon us, and infects almost every Church these days. Judaism was never even the OT faith in the first place, but its Babylonian counterfeit after the Exile.

It is a direct descendant of the ‘Tradition of the Elders’– Pharisaism– that our Lord so soundly condemned. So if proclaiming the Truth is ‘antisemitic’, then so be it. I’ve long ago stopped caring about the buzzwords people use to try and silence Truth.

So think of me what you wish; the historical stands of the Church and the Scriptures remain clear, in spite of all of the modernists’ attempts to do away with them.

12. The Prodigal Son - June 11, 2011

Hi Marcus…

Glad you returned. Especially now that I know who you are (sorta).

You will note that even though I know you disagree w/ me – I’ll still be civil to you and I won’t call you names or anything like they do at OC.net.

(O)ur host here asked me to point out specifically what I saw wrong in the images from this work. Certainly, let us start with the cover. The blond ubermensch figure posed prominently. It may or may not also be a coincidence he is holding an 8 ball given the symbolic usage the number 8 is put to in neo-Nazi and associated circles. That one though I’ll let pass as the 8 ball tends to be a visual cliche when someone picks up a pool ball in comics or cartoons. Next we have the women being forcibly restrained by the ‘other’ in this case a number of Jews drawn with sinister smiles.”

Alright… finally something of substance.

(L)et us start with the cover. The blond ubermensch figure posed prominently.”

You have a problem with blond haired White men?

They’re not allowed to be comic book heroes in today’s world? Have you considered that maybe the artist has modeled the hero after himself?

It may or may not also be a coincidence he is holding an 8 ball given the symbolic usage the number 8 is put to in neo-Nazi and associated circles.”

Really? The number 8 = “Neo-Nazis”?

According to the notes in my Orthodox Study Bible:

“In the Bible, the number six stands for falling short, incompleteness, imperfection; seven, for perfection, fullness, completion; eight, for eschatological perfection, a superabundance of fullness (see II En 33:1).

The sixth day, Friday, is the day of preparation; the seventh, the Sabbath, Saturday, a picture of the rest to come; the eighth day, Sunday, the day of the Resurrection, the final establishment of God’s kingdom.

The numerical equivalent of Jesus in Greek is 888.”

In any case – I don’t know any “neo-Nazis” so I wouldn’t know what they use or don’t use. I wonder how it is that you know these things.

Next we have the women being forcibly restrained by the ‘other’ in this case a number of Jews drawn with sinister smiles.”

Well, I think it’s clear that they are cast as the villains (because they want that foreskin)… The woman is the wife of a ‘Jewish’ man who wants their son cut – while she does not want her son to be mutilated and fellated by a filthy ‘rabbi’.

I say good for her!

I don’t blame her. If someone was trying to do that to my son – I wouldn’t allow it either; they’d have to hold me back as well.

Finally we have the topper, the piece de resistance, the innocent child being threatened by the ‘other’.”

Yes, that’s right – infants (innocent, all of ’em) are the main target of the perverted mutilators. The child is not consulted about the impending (un-necessary) removal of a significant portion of their penile flesh… If I came to your house wishing to cut off a portion of one of your children’s anatomy – I would hope that you too would attempt to put a stop to it!

Add little details like the young woman being shown in a slightly cheesecake fashion and we have a classic piece of propaganda.”

Huh? Not sure what you mean here.

It has the brave resolute hero protecting his land from the dirty foreigners with their outsiders’ way who threaten the women and children of the nation.”

I don’t think that the ‘Jews’ are portrayed as “foreigners” in the comic at all. They’re clearly Americans.

Their way is not the “outsiders’ way”… Their way is the anti-Christ way. Lots of ‘outsiders’ don’t slice up and suck the blood from babies’ penises. It has naught to do with them being ‘outsiders’…

It has everything to do with them being foreskin burglars and disgusting baby penis blood sucking anti-Christs.

The implied sexual subtexts of young attractive women being threatened by the naughty, naughty Jews on that cover and some of the other images is far from subtle either.”

How dare that White woman be attractive?!

BTW – did you just admit that you find a cartoon lady attractive? Whatever floats your boat I guess!

Anyway… They don’t threaten her. Hold her? Yes. Threaten her? Not in there.

In any case many of the posts on this issue here thus far are interesting, it’s apparently not anti-semitic but yet talk of ‘crypto-Jews’ and Zionist globalists abounds whilst defending it.”

The discussion was about the comic book series (in which only one of the two issues deals with ‘Jews’)…

Yes, there are many globalist Zionists.

Yes, there are ‘Jews’ which hide the fact that they are, changing their names and joining Churches, etc.

This wasn’t supposed to be about me or my opinions anyway
… this was supposed to be about the comics and specifically how they are ‘antisemitic’.

I don’t see it.

Oh almost forgot again, these are some of your own words on the Orthodox forum in question:-

    “The moderator (who you think ‘is to be commended’) is probably Jewish too I’m guessing. I think he’s still cranky from back when someone asked me about the ‘Holocaust’.
    What about you? Any Talmudists in the old family tree?”

You were talking to me there. Would you care to comment on those remarks at all? Also Unforgiven is a great Clint Eastwood movie I’m sure you’d agree…”

Well… to be absolutely accurate here, my words to you there were found in a personal message to you – not on the forum.

What kind of a comment are you expecting?

You were irrationally defending & upholding the validity of the accusations of ‘antisemitism’ leveled against the creator of this comic… That would make more sense (to me at least) if you were yourself ‘Jewish’. If you had no Talmudists in your tree then all you had to do was say so.

Now that I know that you’re Irish (as all of my ancestors were)… it makes very little sense at all, except when you factor in the fact that you are a Romist. I think Rome has long been subjugated.

They have a bank for God’s sake! That tells much of the story right there, don’t you think my friend?

As for ‘Unforgiven’… I don’t watch movies.

13. scheung - June 13, 2011

Folks at oc.net are a bunch of Jew-Lovers. They muted me too.

They might as well shed their facade of orthodoxy and go full bore into that crappy Jewish religion.

14. The Prodigal Son - June 14, 2011

‘Jew lovers’? Yeah, some of them I guess…

I think it’s just a taboo subject where they end up policing themselves (with the help of the few open resident ‘Jews’ that hang around a supposedly Orthodox Christian Forum for some reason)…

They are terrified of the dreaded ‘antisemitism’… It’s literally been drilled into them (as it had been in me). I can remember when I first started looking into these things… the World Wars, the ‘Holocaust’ – I felt sorta like I was being naughty or something; like I should be hiding under the blankets while I was reading.

Then I realized… there’s too much at stake here. I love the Truth more than my life.

They might as well shed their facade of Orthodoxy and go full bore into that crappy Jewish religion.”

I know that at least one of them over there has done just that. He literally calls himself ‘Jewish’ now. While the rest try to tell me that Jesus is ‘Jewish’.

I would rather see them do that than drag it into Orthodoxy with them. People really buy their crap for some reason…

15. Marcus - June 14, 2011

‘That crappy Jewish religion’, ‘A bunch of Jew lovers’, ‘Talmudists in the family tree’,’ foreskin burglars and disgusting baby penis blood sucking anti-Christs.’

“Bigotry tries to keep truth safe in its hand with a grip that kills it.”

– Rabindranath Tagore

16. Mike - June 14, 2011

Marcus, you are lukewarm. Do you even know the etymology of the word ‘bigot’ anyway? It actually has a pretty zealous origin. I guess St John Chrysostom, Blessed Augustine, & St. Basil were ‘bigots’ as well? Or was our Lord Himself a bigot? (‘NO MAN comes to the Father except through ME..’..’It is not meet to take the children’s bread and cast it to dogs…”, etc, etc).

Was the Apostle John a bigot when he defined the antichrist as anyone who claims to have the Father without the Son? Or was John the Baptist a bigot when he asked the Pharisees who had told them to flee the wrath to come, and would not baptize them? Or was St Paul a bigot when he spoke of ‘certain men–especially of the circumcision–‘ subverting households whose mouths must be stopped? Once again..buzzwords..

Bigot, racist, antisemite…it all sounds like Charlie Brown’s teacher to me now when y’all cry it out loud , as the ancient religion of Nimrod becomes the norm more & more w/ each passing day. Enjoy your mental — and sooner or later, physical– slavery to the Beast, and all those bowing like lowly serfs before that star of Molech.

17. scheung - June 14, 2011

Indeed. When they converted they should have left their Protestant or Dispensationalist and Zionist-Israel-Jew worshipping baggage at the door. When they have done that, then I know that they have truly joined the Orthodox Church.

18. scheung - June 14, 2011

“They are mostly (if not all) former Protestants that have fast-tracked their way into the priesthood and they are ruining Orthodoxy. They think ‘Israel’ is a bunch of anti-Christ Pharisees and their descendants living in occupied Palestine!”

… Or former Papists that were fast tracked in, some of them in the Old Calendarist movement.

19. Marcus - June 14, 2011

Small problem there Mike, Christ, Paul and John the Baptist were all Jews of course…..

(Note from Prodigal Son: Oh here we go…)

The Prodigal Son - June 14, 2011

Well, if we’re going to quote Hindus…

“Zionism in its spiritual sense is a lofty aspiration. By spiritual sense I mean they should want to realize the Jerusalem that is within. Zionism meaning reoccupation of Palestine has no attraction for me. I can understand the longing of a Jew to return to Palestine, and he can do so if he can without the help of bayonets, whether his own or those of Britain.

In that event he would go to Palestine peacefully and in perfect friendliness with the Arabs. The real Zionism of which I have given you my meaning is the thing to strive for, long for and die for. Zion lies in one`s heart. It is the abode of God. The real Jerusalem is the spiritual Jerusalem. Thus he can realize this Zionism in any part of the world.

(…) And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I have no doubt that they are going about it in the wrong way.

The Palestine of the Biblical conception is not a geographical tract. It is in their hearts. But if they must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs. They should seek to convert the Arab heart. The same God rules the Arab heart who rules the Jewish heart.

They can offer satyagraha in front of the Arabs and offer themselves to be shot or thrown into the Dead Sea without raising a little finger against them. They will find the world opinion in their favor in their religious aspiration. There are hundreds of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they will only discard the help of the British bayonet. As it is, they are co-shares with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them.

I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarrantable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.

Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating their position on earth.

– Mohandas ‘Mahatma’ Gandhi

20. Marcus - June 14, 2011

Rather twisting Gandhi’s points are you not?

He said ‘according to the accepted canons of right and wrong’, he is at pains to point out he defends violence from neither side in fact even within the quotes you have provided.

The Prodigal Son - June 14, 2011

I am not “twisting” anything.

I quoted the man word-for-word; verbatim. Every word was his… and not one was mine.

You’re the one who’s getting a little twisty there. Of course Gandhi deplored violence… but…

He said:

… according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.

He made no similar observations about the invading Jews who have always clearly been the aggressors, and the colonizers of land that was never theirs.

The Arabs (and we) have always known that the ‘Jews’ fully intend to take all of the land – from the Nile to the Euphrates… Can anyone really blame the native residents and historical owners of that land for fighting to keep it??

21. scheung - June 14, 2011

Oh dear here we go again, The Christ is a Jew argument.. smh.

BUT JESUS WAS A JEW.
“ON THAT OLD JEWISH AND PROTESTANT EXCUSE”

In the Old Testament, no matter in which language, the word “Jew” is never applied to Adam, Seth, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, King Saul, King David, or King Solomon. The word translated in many English versions as “Jew” first occurs in 2 KINGS 16:6,(and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) and it refers to those of the territory of the two (kingdoms), that is, the men of the kingdom of Judah in the South (“Judah” is from the Hebrew; “Judaea, Judea” is Latin from the Greek “Ioudaios”), as opposed to those in the kingdom of Israel in the North, the territory of the ten other tribes. According to the Oxford English dictionary (1978), the word “Jew” (Gyv) occurs for the first time in English c. 1275 A.D.

The Lord Jesus Christ lived on Earth as a Judaean (in the LXX “The Septuagint”, Or what the Protestants erroneously call the “Alexandrian Scriptures” and New Testament, “Ioudaios”) in that He was a member of the tribe of Judah (a tribe named for one of the sons of the Patriarch Jacob, son of Isaac, son of Abraham)—as was prophesied of the Messiah in GENESIS 49:10: Christ will be the King of Judah, the King of the Judaeans, the King of all Israel, the King of kings and Lord of lords. Christ’s Life on Earth was an enfleshment of the Divine economy: in Him the Old Covenant, given to Old Israel to prepare her for Him, was passing away, was being brought to its fulfillment in the birth of His Church (Which Today is the Orthodox Catholic Church aka. The Eastern Orthodox Church, or the Greek Orthodox Church), the New Israel. Christ therefore “fulfilled all righteousness” (MATTHEW 3:15): He was obedient to the very Law He had given to Moses some thirteen hundred years before. This is a dimension of His kenosis, His self-emptying for the salvation of all who wanted Him. He was circumcised, baptized, wore tassels from the corners of his garment, told the Samaritan woman that “salvation is from the Judaeans”—meaning, the ten other tribes (the kingdom of Israel) had been absorbed by Assyria in the eighth century B.C., and the center of what God had until then revealed was in Judah/Judaea. Christ, though, lived on Earth not just as a Judaean, a member of one of only two remaining tribes (the other being Benjamin) but as a member of Old Israel, the people who kept the oracles of God and awaited the fulfillment of His promises—for it is from within the Old economy that God establishes the New. As an Israelite, Christ tells the non-Israelite Samaritan woman: “…The time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain (Gerazim, in Samaria, in the Northern kingdom of Israel) NOR in Jerusalem (in the Southern kingdom of Judah/Judaea)…A time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth (in my Church, The Orthodox Christian Church, The Orthodox Catholic Church)…” (JOHN 4:21,23). The one true God always desired Israel to be composed of all nations; Israel, though, very often said NO! to God. Christ, then, is God in His human nature offering sacrifice on behalf of Israel’s sins: Israel cannot save herself, so God will save her in Himself, in His Church the New Israel, His Body—just as He had promised in post-Fall Eden, and had been promising through His holy prophets for centuries. Christ is Who every true Israelite (and all the nations) had been yearning for, dreaming of, waiting for. And yet: Saint Paul teaches that “they are not all Israel which are of Israel” (ROMANS 9:6).

Christ most certainly was not “Jewish” in the sense meant by modern Jewish spiritual descendants of the Pharisees, so-called “Orthodox Jews”, for these spiritual descendants, by rejecting Christ, are not Israel: and neither were those Pharisees who’d done the same. Neither the Jews who wrote down the oral law of those Christomachist (Christ-Fighting) Pharisees in the normative Jewish work known as the Talmud (completed c. 500 A.D.), which places Christ in hell, in boiling excrement and semen (GITTIN 57a) nor the “mystical” branch of those Pharisees (a member of which was the 13th century Moses de Leon, who wrote the ZOHAR [part of Kabbalah], passing it off as the work of the 2nd century A.D. Rabbi Simeon ben Yochai) which places Him on a dung heap filled with worms, with Mohammad and dead dogs and dead donkeys (ZOHAR III, 282a) have anything to do with Jesus Christ: they WANT nothing to do with Him. They are not His; He is not theirs. The Jews who composed these normative works of Judaism completely perverted the revelation of God, in order to exult in their own demonic traditions, which they picked up during their exile in Babylon (which did not end in the late 6th century B.C. [relatively few of the children of Israel returned to Jerusalem with Ezra and Nehemiah: most remained in Babylon] but lasted until the Moslems expelled them from the region in the 11th century A.D.), and to identify the Lord Jesus Christ with them is to be guilty of anachronism at best, and at worst, is a subversion of the economy of the Lord, He Who taught believers that all Judaeans, all the tribe of Judah, all inhabitants of Judah, ALL who rejected Him were “this generation,” a phrase which in Greek (n autn genea) means those who share traits, especially negative traits, in this case the sin of having rejected Him. Those Judaeans who cut themselves off from Christ perpetuated a religion which defines itself in opposition to Him and His Church.

This religion is now called “Judaism,” which is discontinuous with the revelation God gave Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and King David, since that revelation IS ABOUT CHRIST: this is a fact of salvation history. Judaism and its Jews, however, not only reject Christ but perversely excoriate Him: this is a fact of damnation history. The religion of present-day Jews (the synagogue of Satan) has nothing to do with what the Lord Who is Yahweh revealed to Old Israel in the Old Testament, a revelation that, properly understood—that is, according to the mind of the Church—is Christian, for it was CHRIST Who is revealing Himself to Old Israel: “If you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote of Me” (JOHN 5:46). “Everything must be fulfilled that is written about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms” (LUKE 24:44). “The words of Moses are the words of Christ” (Saint Irenaios of Lyons, AGAINST HERESIES, Book IV, Chapter 2). Find someone today who identifies himself as an “Orthodox” Jew and ask him if he believes that Christ is Yahweh (when you see the Greek words “o wv” in the nimbus that surrounds Christ’s head in icons, you are beholding the Church’s teaching that Christ is “He Who Is”, Yahweh, “the God of the Old Testament,” Who is actually the God of both the Old and the New) or if he believes the teaching of Saint Irenaios. No “real” Jew believes that the Lord Jesus Christ was a “real” Jew. Indeed, a “real” Jew believes that Christ perverted Judaism, that He was an apostate Jew.

“Jewish” means accepting the synagogue’s view of Christ—a false prophet, a deceiver who led Israel astray: therefore this term cannot honestly be retroactively injected into the Old Testament, since the Old Testament righteous were responding not to proto-Talmudists but to the pre-incarnate Christ. To call the Old Testament righteous men and women “Jewish” is to ahistorically assert that they were proto-Jews, spiritual ancestors of those who now inhabit today’s synagogues. But this is not what the Lord Jesus Christ taught. He says to those Pharisees (spiritual fathers of modern “Orthodox” Jews) who were rejecting Him by claiming that only Abraham was their father that “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see MY DAY” (JOHN 8:56). Again, all the Old Testament righteous were responding to the pre-incarnate Christ, Who in the Spirit reveals the Father.

Abraham was not even a Judaean (the twelve tribes did not yet exist), let alone a Jew, but a Gentile (from Mesopotamia) to whom the Lord God (Christ) condescended to reveal part of His plan for mankind. Since the twelve tribes did not yet exist, how can we call Isaac and Jacob even Judaeans, let alone Jews, which is now, 2000 years after the Incarnation, the term for the synagogue (of satan), that is, the rebellious men and women who throughout the centuries have continued to reject Christ and therefore God? Isaac did not reject the pre-incarnate Christ Who was saving Israel: indeed, Isaac is a type of Christ; Jacob not only did not reject Christ, but prophesied His reign. Moses was of the tribe of Levi and a member of Old Israel. God made him prophet and Lawgiver. Moses prophesied that God would “raise up for (Old Israel) a prophet like you (Moses) from among their brethren” (DEUTERONOMY 18:18): this prophecy is about Christ. And so is every word of the Law, if understood according to the mind of the Church. King David was a Judaean in that he belonged to the tribe of Judah: but Judaeans are not necessarily Jews. King David prophesies about Christ: he is FOR Him, anticipatively. The entire Old Testament is about Christ. A Jew, however, is someone who accepts and perpetuates the teachings of Christomachist (Christ-Fighting) Pharisees, teachings which the Lord Jesus Christ condemned in terms so terrifying that we would do well to reread His words, lest we are tempted to believe the current Jewish (and Protestant) teaching that “Jesus was one of US.” In WHAT EVERY CHRISTIAN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT JEWS AND JUDAISM,

Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein writes (parenthetical remark mine): “Pharisaic Judaism became normative Judaism. Its principle features—the synagogue, the rabbi, prayer, Torah study, and belief in the oral law (which, though condemned by Christ as a perversion of the word of God which would “help” the Pharisees to reject Him, Jews later expressed in writing as the Talmud) became the modes of religious expression guiding Jewish life ever since. All Jewish life today therefore stems from the Pharisaic tradition and derives its central religious characteristics from it” (Word Books, Waco, TX, 1984, p. 258). Jews are those who hold to the false teaching that on Mount Sinai God gave Moses not only the written Law, but also a secret “oral tradition”—the very oral tradition that the Lord Jesus Christ condemns in his attacks on the Pharisees, thereby eternally separating Himself and His disciples from what was to become “Judaism.”

True Christians (Orthodox Catholic Christians aka. Eastern Orthodox Christians) would do well to take this separation seriously, since it will continue on Judgment Day and into Eternity.

Jesus was a ‘Judean’, not a Jew.

During His lifetime, no persons were described as “Jews” anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the “homeland” of the ancestors of those who today style themselves “Jews”. Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their “homeland”, and were known as Khazars, a Turkic Tribe. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a “Jew”. The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term “Texan” signifies a person living in Texas.

In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called “Jews”, they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as “Jew”. The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled “Jews” today refer to as “Jews”, were known as “Pharisees”. “Judaism” today and “Pharisaism” in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhorred and denounced “Pharisaism”; hence the words, “Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers”.

THE END AND GLORY BE TO GOD!

22. scheung - June 14, 2011

Is Jesus “A Jew”?

There’s no need to get into an ethnic or racial debate.

It’s mostly a matter of semantics. And, semantically, Jesus Christ clearly doesn’t fit the definition of what is now understood as “a Jew” / “Jewish”.

A “Jew” is essentially a person who claims to be a “Hebrew” or “Israelite” in one way or another, but who rejects the Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth. (And obviously Jesus Christ does not reject himself as Christ.)

This includes the Judaic cultists who follow the Pharisees, the Talmud, Kabbalism, Sabbateanism, etc.; as well as Slavemasonry and other forms of Luciferianism; as well as those who believe in Jewish “racial” supremacism; and those who call themselves ‘Jews’ and who promote typical Jewish evils such as Democracy, Capitalism, Communism, World Government, baby-killing, usury, and so on.

10 Proofs that Jesus is not, in this sense, “a Jew”:

1. Would Jesus Christ wish to kill Himself?

A: No. Jews wanted Him dead, and boast in their Satanic Talmud that they killed Him, and gloat in their blasphemous belief that He is boiling in excrement and semen in hell for eternity. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Christ-Killer), Jesus Christ is not a Jew.

2. Do Jews love Christ?

A: No. They hate Him. Christ does not hate Himself. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Christ-Hater), Christ is not a Jew.

3. Do Jews believe that Jesus of Nazareth is God?

A: No. Jesus of Nazareth knows He is God (before Abraham was, I AM). Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Christ-Denier) Christ is not a Jew.

4. Do Jews love The Body of Christ, The Church?

A: No. They despise the Church and seek to destroy it. Christ loves His Church. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Church-Hater), Christ is not a Jew.

5. Do Jews love and honor The Theotokos; the Mother of God, The All-Holy, Most Pure and Ever Virgin Mary?

A: No. In the filthy blasphemous Satanic Talmud, they call her a whore and say without shame that she had sex with the best man at her wedding while she was menstruating (this “niddah” status being especially disgusting to the female-hating Jews, who thank their idol every day that they were not born female or “goy“ [non-Jew]). Christ loves His Blessed Mother. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Virgin Mary-Hater), Christ is not a Jew.

6. Do Jews believe that all of humanity can be saved by Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God?

A: No. Firstly, they believe that only they themselves are human, and that the “goyim” [non-Jews] are “supernal dust” only created to serve the divinely “superior” ‘Jews’. Secondly, they foolishly and/or malevolently believe that Christ does not save, and even try to keep people from Christian salvation. Jesus Christ knows that He saves, does save, and wants us all to be saved. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Salvation-Denier), Christ is not a Jew.

7. Do Jews believe that they are equal to those Homines sapientes; those non-‘Jewish’ human beings that they derisively label “goyim“?

A: No. They believe not only that they are superior to the “goyim“, but also that the “goyim” are not even human. God the Son loves all of His creation. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Racial Supremacist), Christ is not a Jew.

8. Do Jews believe they have a divine DNA? / Do Jews think that they are inherently genetically superior — and the rest of us are nothing but dreck…?

A: Yes. Christ teaches that Jews do not have divine DNA. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Self-Idolator) Christ is not a Jew.

9. Do Jews believe that a piece of land belongs to them, and that they, therefore, have the right to murder the residents of that land and steal their land from them?

A: Yes. God is not in the real estate business any more; Christ teaches that nothing belongs to the Jews. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Murderer and Land-Thief in Palestine), Christ is not a Jew.

10. Do Jews recognize that The Christian Church is Israel?

A: No. They deny that Christ’s Church is Israel, and many even blasphemously maintain that a sinful polity in Palestine based on theft and lies is Israel. Ergo: By this definition (Jew = Israel-Denier), Christ is not a Jew.

Here’s why Jesus is NOT a ‘Jew’:

– Jesus is a Judahite (of the tribe of Judah).

– The people calling themselves ‘Jews’ today are NOT Judahites, nor are they descended from Judahites.

– The vast majority of people who call themselves ‘Jews’ today are actually just modern-day Pharisees or descendants of same, most being descended from the Khazars who converted to Pharisaism/Talmudism in the 8th century AD.

– Jesus is NOT a Pharisee, never was a Pharisee and warned His disciples to beware the leaven of the Pharisees.

– Jesus, when He was incarnate on earth as a flesh & blood Man adhered to the law of Moses.

– Those who call themselves ‘Jews’ today DO NOT keep the law of Moses.

– Those who call themselves ‘Jews’ today adhere instead to the ‘traditions of the elders/traditions of men’ which are now codified in the Talmud.

– Jesus denounced the Pharisees & their doctrines, for they had usurped Moses’ seat, by their traditions making the commandments of God & the law of Moses of no effect.

If Jesus is a ‘Jew’ – then those who call themselves ‘Jews’ today are clearly NOT ‘Jews’ in the same sense that Jesus is.

Likewise if those who call themselves ‘Jews’ today ARE ‘Jews’ – then Jesus is certainly NOT a ‘Jew’ in the same sense of the word.

‘Is Jesus a Jew?’

23. Mike - June 14, 2011

Amen Scheung.. Couldn’t have said it better myself. People always use the ole ‘But they were “Jews”‘ argument.. Its nonsense.

The Judeans that followed Christ in the First Century a) were true Israelites that truly understood the OT faith, not Pharisaism and b) a whole different people than the Babylonian/Khazar/Idumean polyglot that solely became the only ones left known as Judeans (aka “Jews”) after AD70.

Besides, the Church is Israel and therefore even if one was still a ‘true Judean’, he’d still be an anti-Christ as long as he was still following the wicked Talmudic ‘Traditions of the Elders’.

24. scheung - June 15, 2011

Mike, Thanks for the extra stuff. I have a collection of these articles on countering this “Jesus was a Jew” nonsense.

25. Mike - June 15, 2011

Where are you from scheung? Am I the only American on here?

26. scheung - June 15, 2011

I’m an American of Chinese Descent, you are not alone.

27. Mike - June 16, 2011

I truly wish more of my people (White Europeans) would wake the hell up!

Too many are part of the problem instead of the solution, even though it is worshiping one’s own executioners! We have become suicidal as a Folk!

Lord Have Mercy!

The Prodigal Son - June 17, 2011

I wish everyone would wake up.

†IC XC†
†NI KA†

28. Marcus - June 20, 2011

I truly wish more of my people (White Europeans) would wake the hell up!

Too many are part of the problem instead of the solution, even though it is worshiping one’s own executioners! We have become suicidal as a Folk!

Lord Have Mercy!”

What an interesting and eloquent post indeed….

29. Mike - June 21, 2011

What is so wrong with saying such a thing?? Is it ‘racist’ to want my people to know the Truth? I was acknowledging the fact that my people are the biggest part of the problem, while also acknowledging the fact that many in other ethnicities, like many Arabs and others, easily seem to see these truths.

I, like them, am not scared from tackling these truths due to the psychological blackmail of made up Trotskyite words like ‘racist’. I have been arguing with the liberals & the neo-conservative zionists & all the ‘one-worlder’ types and their pseudo-intellectualism for decades now.

They do not sway me, nor should they sway anyone that has a solid Biblical & Canonical foundation.

30. 正教会の智 - June 25, 2011

Marcus:

“Let us start with the cover & the blond ubermensch figure posed prominently”

If that’s where you’re going to start, then we can safely discount everything else you write as Jewby trash.

“Oy Vey! There’s a blond man on the cover of a comic book!”

Sorry, not just a blond, but a blond übermensch!

31. 正教会の智 - June 25, 2011

Marcus:

“the [Papist] Church…does not regard Judaism as the faith in which the truth of Christ is revealed at it’s fullest.”

Jew John Paul II:

“The Jews are our elder brothers in the faith.”

Jew or Jews’ Whore and/or Freemason Benedict XVI:

“The Jews are OUR FATHERS in the faith.”

32. 正教会の智 - June 25, 2011

BIGOT was the codeword for “British Invasion of German-Occupied Territory” (when 1/4 of humanity was under British rule).

33. 正教会の智 - June 25, 2011

Marcus:

“Gandhi…is at pains to point out he defends violence from neither side”

1. Gandhi was an idiot in general.

2. Gandhi despised Christians, Blacks, etc.

3. Gandhi was a bugger with a Jew.

4. Gandhi was wrong. Jews had no right to use violence against Palestinians in general. Palestinians had every right to use certain levels of violence to repel the Jew invaders.

34. The Prodigal Son - June 24, 2012

Infant Dies After Contracting Herpes Through Circumcision

Maimonides
A two-week old infant died last fall in a Brooklyn hospital from herpes contracted from a religious circumcision. According to the Daily News, the unidentified infant died last September at Maimonides Hospital—the cause of death was listed as “disseminated herpes simplex virus Type 1, complicating ritual circumcision with oral suction.” The case sounds eerily similar to that of Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, a Rockland County mohel who was found to have given three babies herpes through the ritual.

Fisher specialized in the ultra-Orthodox ritual known as metzizah b’ peh, in which a rabbi or mohel removes blood from the wound with his mouth. One of those three babies infected with herpes by Fisher died, and the city Health Department filed a restraining order stopping Fisher from performing the procedure. But thecity ultimately caved and handed the matter over onto a Jewish religious court.

Last year, a Queens toddler who went into Beth Israel Hospital for a routine circumcision died after he was given a general anesthetic instead of a local one. There has also been an active intactivist movement working in San Francisco, who believe in the right of baby boys to keep their foreskins intact. The last we heard of them, their reach may have exceeded their grasp: the group was roundly criticized for a series of online comic books featuring “Foreskin Man” fighting the “Monster Mohel,” which many called antisemitic.

From The Gothamist

35. The Prodigal Son - June 24, 2012

Another circumcised baby bleeds to death in England

Newborn

A baby boy bled to death after the Rabbi who circumcised him advised his concerned mother to stem the bleeding from the wound with Vaseline (petroleum jelly).

According to an online report on the circumcision death the incicision in Angelo Ofori-Mintah’s penis began to bleed a few hours after Rabbi Mordehai Cohen circumcised the one-month-old baby from Queens Park London.

Realising her son was bleeding, Mrs Maame Abrafi who is originally from Ghana, removed the bandage at home. Mrs Abrafi asked a friend to contact the Rabbi and he advised applying petroleum jelly to the wound.

The Deputy Coroner Shirley Radcliffe described this as a “tragic break-down in communication” and although the bleeding eventually stopped, Angelo became cold and pale and was rushed to hospital with dangerously low oxygen levels. He suffered a cardiac arrest and died in the early hours of 17 February 2012 and tests revealed he had lost about three-quarters of his total blood volume and died as a result of an acute haemorrhage due to circumcision.

The coroner angered opponents of Unnecessary Male Circumcision today by ruling that the death was accidental. It isn’t the first time Dr Radcliffe has angered campaigners. The doctor hit the headlines last year when the family of a cyclist killed by a lorry took legal action against her claiming she failed to comply with her duties to “fully, fairly and fearlessly” investigate the facts of the death

Angelo’s is not the first baby to bleed to death as the result of a circumcision. Later this year a Salford midwife will be tried for the manslaughter of the baby Goodluck Caubergs who bled to death in 2012.

In light of this recent death you are strongly encourage to sign our online petition to government – click here now to help us End Unnecessary Male Circumcision in the UK.

From HERE

36. The Prodigal Son - October 18, 2012

Baby Penis Bloodsucking Rabbi


Say something!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s