A Roman Catholic Dared to Speak the Truth! (A Bishop, a Pope, and a Sheeple) July 12, 2011Posted by The Prodigal Son in Christianity, Jews, Lies & Propaganda, New World Order.
Tags: A Bishop, a Pope, and a Sheeple, Bishop Richard Williamson, BS, Catholicism, Dictatorship, Ernst Zundel, Hollow¢o$t, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Ingrid Zundel, Jews, Lies, Money, Pharisees, Six Million, So-called 'Jews', SSPX, Terrorism, Zionism
“These Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures.”
– Chairman, New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education (Newark Star–Ledger, 23 Oct. 1996, p 15)
~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~
Saturday, July 9th, 2011
It gives me no pleasure to predict that the Federal Republic of Germany is about to soil itself again to please the Noisy Lobby.
The players in the coming spectacle are noteworthy. The story is worth pondering because it has all the earmarks of a wide-screen feature film I hope a savvy producer somewhere is going to pick up. It could be another Scopes Monkey Trial feature right in the heart of Europe.
Imagine an erudite man of the cloth embroiled in a spiritual war against a bullying minority ensconced in a “shitty little country” with branches in New York, London, and Tel Aviv. These bullies are swinging the Auschwitz cudgel in a disgracefully cowed Vaterland in hopes that the current Pope on St. Peter’s Throne will remain in the thralls of a soul-deadening myth. The man of the cloth is a British Bishop of a renegade Catholic church called SSPX (Society of St. Pius X) who has dug in his heels and stands firm.
I am sketching the backdrop for you as it was told to me. A couple of years ago, His Excellency did an interview for Swedish television in a German town called Zaitzhofen. The topic of that interview was to be a theological issue that needed elucidation. After the interview was done, the interviewer sprang a political rat: Just where, exactly, did His Excellency stand on the Hallowed Holocaust?
Bishop Richard Williamson spoke off the cuff into a tape that was still running. He spoke in privacy, behind closed doors. He knew that what he said was against political dogma as well as widespread social consensus in the Bundesrepublik. However, he was a subject of the Queen of England. The television crew was Swedish. In order not to offend against proscribed German law that stifles any discussions, much less allows investigation according to a legal construct called “Offenkundigkeit” – “The Holocaust is ’obvious’!” – he asked that his answer not be broadcast in censor-ridden Germany. He knew there might be fallout – he didn’t know how much.
New angle. The Bishop’s church, more fully known as “The Society of Pope St. Pius X”, named after a late Pope, adheres to traditional Catholic dogma. Mean tongues have branded Pope Pius X as “Hitler’s Pope”, allegedly for his relaxed demeanor during the Second World War, scolding him for “not having done enough”, “not having spoken out enough” against the Holocaust. (Note from me: The above in italics is an error. The man derided as ‘Hitler’s Pope’ was Pius XII not Pius X )
I won’t go into what this splinter church believes and therefore practices, because I know nothing of Catholic ways. It is my understanding, though, that the SSPX does not take a stand on political-secular issues – their main grudge against the current Church of Rome is its enthusiastic adaptation to modernity, a trend believed to be proscribed and monitored behind the scenes by Zion.
In 1988, the year when Richard Williamson was ordained as Bishop of the SSPX, the Church of Rome took a firm stand and excommunicated him, along with several others, thus creating a spiritual Catholic out-elite. This splinter group follows the rituals, including Latin mass, that grew over millennia much like an oak with a life of its own, hard at the core, unyielding in substance. As SSPX faithful see it, traditional dogma is to be sternly observed.
The SSPX movement became very attractive to many. This defiantly renegade church has grown and solidified over the decades, whereas the Chair of St. Peter, watered down by way-too-much PC, as SSPX disciples claim, has lost its deified edge.
Please note the convergence of dates. In 1988, the very year when His Excellency was shown the door in Rome for following his conscience, Ernst Zundel’s Second Great Holocaust Trial in Toronto brought forth the weighty Leuchter Report – the first forensic investigation ever in more than 40 years that proves that science does not lie, not even for the “NAZIS”.
The so-called “Holocaust” is bunk.
The Leuchter Report findings have since been replicated several times and verified. What US execution equipment expert Leuchter found and documented to the horror of the Lobby destroyed the orthodox, widely believed claims about the gassings alleged to have happened at Auschwitz.
The Jews of Canada were plain beside themselves! In response, they did what Jews do – they start spewing fire and flame all over mainstream media to discredit the rebel who dares cause a crack to their clout.
Alan Borovoy, a lawyer of the Canadian Civil Liberties Union, a Jewish stronghold of the Left in Canada as elsewhere, informed the media minions that Zundel was a “peripheral non-entity” who couldn’t fill a phone booth with supporters of his views. In tandem, other spokesmen for the Jewish Lobby were joining the fray , as predictably happens when Zion blows into its trumpets so as to keep gentiles in line.
Remember the song of the Sixties:
“Those were the days, my friend – we thought they’d never end…”
The Holocaust, as peddled by media extravagances like “Shoah”, ran on some potent emotional fuel. No qualm was ever uttered. If you knew on which side your bread was buttered, you wouldn’t be caught dead doubting the claims of the Holocaust Remembrance Lobby, as Zundel had done. Few were the braves that strode into his court room where angels feared to tread.
His Excellency, then ministering in a US Midwest town just south of Canada, was one of those rare braves. Legend has it that the Bishop caught a whiff from mainstream media about a German rebel embroiled in a concerted four-months trial – and as one out-elitist to another, it stands to reason that His Excellency may have found some food for thought in what he saw and heard about the Auschwitz Saga. This accidental walk-in spectator caught Holocaust Denial, so they say, as though he were catching the measles.
These days, Revisionists sit back and rather smugly watch how Holocaust Denial has morphed onto so many major political stages that there is nothing more to be argued. The scientific battle has been won – that there is still fierce spiritual warfare is neither here nor there. Science will never mix with dogma. It should be food for thought in our Western world that the entire Arab world is wise to the fact that wherever the Holocaust Card is rammed down people’s throats, they are watching a Weapon of Mass Deception under the pretext of an unverified historical claim.
The Arab countries still think with their blood. The Arab countries aren’t Europe, subdued and docilized by Zion.
What happens in Europe, by contrast, especially in Germany, can only be called lunacy. As Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen shrieked at the conclusion of a recent Stalinist show trial that cost Ernst Zundel five years, it doesn’t even matter if there was a Holocaust or not, Herr Zundel! The law says you can’t question it! And, furthermore, not only can’t you question it, you good-for-nothing rogue, your own defense team cannot, either! Off with their heads, the whole lot!
Words to that effect were actually spoken in Mannheim, believe it or not. That so-called German judge delivered himself of an Old-Testament curse in broad daylight. Even a bird will refuse to fly over your grave, Herr Zundel! In a courtroom in 2007. On behalf of Germany’s Zionist masters.
That’s Europe today, three generations after so-called “liberation.”
The German politologist, Udo Walendy, spent years in jail – not for what he said and wrote, mind you, but for what he should have said and written – and didn’t!
The one-time NPD party leader, Günter Deckert, was sentenced and incarcerated because, allegedly, he smirked while verbally translating the 1988 Leuchter Report to a mere handful of his friends.
Best-selling author, David Irving, likewise a British subject, was thrown into an Austrian jail on grounds that he misspoke himself on Auschwitz – not yesterday, not last week, month, or year – no! Seventeen years ago!
And yet, try all you want to legislate against a temporal religion – doubt has a way of spreading like crabgrass.
Who can forget the David Irving quote that “…more people died on the back seat of Senator Kennedy’s car than ever died in the gas chamber of Auschwitz…”?
Just recently, the French comedian Dieudonné complained to hearty applause that he is being dragged before a court and fined for making people laugh!
Back to the Church of Rome, believed to be hollowed out from within by clandestine political interests so as to ever more weaken the West – for decades, bland proclamations, tame sermons, lackluster financial support!
I can imagine that a beleaguered papal shepherd might well have cast a longing eye at the SSPX’s vigorous membership growth and decided the time had come to practice forgiveness for a bit of politically incorrect speech so as to lure more than a million errant sheep back home into the fold.
I don’t know if this was the reason. I’m guessing.
At any rate, a German-born Pope on the Throne of St. Peter stretched out his hand to four renegade Bishops, inviting them in from out of the cold. He did this in all innocence. He says he didn’t know about the Big-H heresy allegedly tainting the renegade church. At least that’s what he claims.
Many see that Swedish television taping as a deliberate move meant to entrap the Bishop so as to embarrass the Pope. You judge for yourself what His Excellency said, for the record:
In a sane world, this would not have triggered a crisis. Alas, we no longer live in a rational world. Like trained seals, the smear mongers sprang into action. The media tsunami was vicious.
Some people had long memories.
After all, who had been, once upon a wicked time, the leader of a pack of Hitler Youth? Pope Benedict the XVI – that’s who!
No doubt intent on training them on Hitler’s orders to become proverbial genocidal monsters!
It was ugly, and it didn’t stop. To this day, it is going full tilt. Big people jumped into the fray. It must have hurt the good Bishop a lot.
What must he have thought as he watched Chancellor Merkel demand that the Pope explain himself and clarify just what, precisely, he thought that he was doing? To welcome back into the fold an utterly disgraceful bunch of well-known haters, racists, antisemites, white supremacists and worse!? How dare a Pope snub scores and scores of Hitler’s concentration camp survivors and disregard that, therefore, Germany is obligated in perpetuity to embrace and endorse what Israel demands?
The Bishop was tried and found wanting. He was fined 10,000 hefty Euros for ten minutes’ worth of interview tape. This fine is now being appealed. A ruling is expected on Monday, 11 July 2011.
I am not holding my breath. The defense can’t be on the facts of the case – for scientific facts cannot be argued in a country where truth is no defense. His argument will be, if only inferentially, that it is not his fault the tape was broadcast in a country that prides itself on crawling on its belly based on a sordid fable.
Many, even those still close to him, have urged His Excellency to grit his teeth and just recant his heresy. Why not apologize? A small concession for the sake of churchly harmony. Why not?
The pressure on the Bishop must be huge.
So far, all indications are this Bishop, for one, won’t recant. He won’t apologize. In a prayerful mode, he has asked for good people all over the world to pray for a just outcome.
Some of us, not part of an official faith, might hope for even more. I know I hope that he will stick to his irreverence and, paraphrasing Oscar Wilde, tell Germany’s appalling censors:
“You have smeared me in absentia. You have charged me in absentia. You have sentenced me in absentia. You might as well shoot me in absentia.”