jump to navigation

Benjamin Freedman Speaks on Zionism and the So-called ‘Jews’ June 10, 2011

Posted by The Prodigal Son in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Introductory Note  — Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century.

     Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

     Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.  Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before. (more…)


Who Is Your Neighbor? January 5, 2011

Posted by The Prodigal Son in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

In old Israel, burial of the dead was considered as a holy task and every Israelite was obliged to actively seek to do kindness by burying the dead. If one found a body it had to be buried before sunset.

The great paradox, however is that by touching a dead body one became unholy and impure. This state prevented him from participating in activities involved in serving the Lord, such as eating from the Passover sacrifice or entering the holy Temple.

This situation meant that in order for a person to perform the holy rite of burying the dead one made oneself unclean. This however didn’t detract faithful Israelites from performing the custom.

In fact it caused the act of burying the dead to be a highly respected act. The idea being that a person should be so eager to perform a good deed, like burying the dead and doing other activities of kindness that he was prepared to make himself unclean was to be admired.

The readiness to become unclean was considered a blessed and holy act.

Once one became unclean one could cleanse oneself by immersing in rainwater or other natural water like a sea or a river. At sunset, one would be certain that all ritual defilement would be gone for the start of the new day. This demonstrated the ritual power of water and faith in God.

The Parable of the Compassionate Samaritan underscores the superior faithfulness, obedience to the Law of Moses, oriental hospitality and charity given from the good character of one of the Samaritan people beyond what the Law required.

More, Jesus Christ’s parable serves to dramatically highlight the completely distorted and impious condition that Pharisaism and “the traditions of men” had set up in their vanity that perverted and twisted the written Law of Moses, and that had worked ruin on Jerusalem, the culture and society, and the people.

A people with no shepherds, were the lost sheep of Israel as our Lord Jesus pointed out time and again. Bad shepherds were the same as having no shepherds at all.

The Samaritans were not only fully despised by the Judeans, there was always an ongoing level of hostility. They were excommunicated by the Great Sanhedrin about AD9 for having distributed dead men’s bones throughout the cloisters of the temple compound (not the temple itself.)

Up until that time, Samaritans worshipped YHWH at the temple in Jerusalem after their own on Mt. Gerazim had been destroyed during Hasmonean rule.

Indeed, the Talmud records the words of the Rabbis who were forced to admit not only that the Samaritans adhered only to the Five Books of Moses, and none of the others, but also that the Samaritans kept the Law even more strictly, piously and obediently than the Judean Pharisees and the Rabbis themselves.

More ironic, Jesus tells the parable to a Scribe, a Sage, a Sopher in order to instruct the “lawyer” in the Great Commandment found in his own written Law of God as given to Moses he was so proud to be an expounder of.

The contentious “lawyer” tests Jesus with the question of “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus answers with Scripture conveying the essential spirit of the Law (Deut. 6:5; Lev. 19:18): “‘Thou shalt love the Lord your God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy strength, and with all thy mind,’ and ‘thy neighbor as thyself.’

The question was put by the expert of the law with a bit of benign contempt of the Galilean implied by his use of the title “Teacher” in addressing Jesus. The Judean heirarchy had no love for either Galileans or a Teacher not of their own ordination.

The lawyer is a Sopher of the Rabbinate, considered the wisest of the wise men of Jerusalem and Judaea. People must call him ‘Master’ and ‘My Great One’ with all due reverence as being next to God Himself in holiness, wearing the prophetic mantle of the Holy Spirit, or risk being beaten by his school of disciples.

The Sopher demanded the principal place in everything, honor for his vast knowledge of the intricacies of the Oral Law. Nothing less than a covey of disciples of his own worshipping at his feet would do.

The Sopher pushed his way to the forefront of every crowd, and was superior to even anointed kings; nay, even superior to King David himself, because David had things to repent for, and did so until his death.

Jesus’ parable describes the robbery victim as being left half-dead by the side of the road. In other words, in such a beaten and unconscious condition, that the only way to determine if he was alive was to touch him — check for breathing or a heartbeat by hand.

But that was to risk becoming unclean in case he was dead. And of course there was the Scriptural, time-honored commandment and case law that would compel any Israelite, including a priest or Levite, to immediately see to the burial of an unattended corpse as it was found.

The Samaritan exceeded the minimum legal requirements — he had compassion on the victim, and a very generous purse opened up for the victim’s care and restoration to full health after taking the man to the nearest caravanseri.

The parable highlights the level of sanctimonious and self-righteous concern of the high priest and the Levite in the parable over their own holy skins, and anxiety to avoid ritual defilement at all cost to themselves whatsoever, especially because of the very temporary inconvenience it might cause.

The priest, seeing the body, immediately moves to the side of the road. The Levite does more. He comes even closer to the victim and looks, then moves to the OTHER SIDE of the road altogether to avoid the victim.

Moreover, the parable is silent on whether the victim was an Israelite or not, yet the Law is very clear that it applies to ANY unattended corpse.

Lawlessness in the guise of law, the spirit of the Law of God made null and void, the chance to save a life and make a friend for life canceled. The opportunity avoided to perform a paradoxical holy deed of great merit in burying the dead, simply because it was inconvenient for the priest and the Levite to wash, and then wait until sundown when the defilement would be made clean again.

Whitewashed sepulchres full of hidden corruption, indeed.

And, as Jesus Christ drew all of His parables from every day life, He surely saw something like this actually occur.

The Sopher, the expert in the law, was hoisted on his own test and convicted of not embracing the spirit of the Law of Moses, and upholding God’s mercy and compassion, and Holy Name.

When Christ asked him, “So which of these three do you think was the neighbor to him who fell among thieves?” And the question also implied another: “Which of these three loved God more?”

And the Sopher, the Great One, had to answer “He who showed mercy on him.”

Meaning the Samaritan. Having a compassion and charitable spirit that would either care for the living neighbor as the parable played out, or care for the dead neighbor, still considered a mercy of great merit.

And a heart that revealed that the Samaritan was a friend of God, like Abraham the Hebrew.

Then Jesus said to the great rabbi, the Sopher, the wise guy, “Go and do likewise.”

~~~ ~ ~ ~~~

From a comment by KathJuliane (via Real Zionist News), January 4, 2011